COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
STANDARD
COSTING (VARIANCE ANALYSIS)
MATERIAL VARIANCES
Definition of
Standard Costing
Standard Costing is a method of costing where actual
costs/revenues are compared with pre-determined standard costs/revenues in
order to:-
1. Calculate different variances (namely Material
Variances, Labour Variances, Overhead Variances and Sales Variances);
2. Analyse the reasons for the variances, which
may be positive as well as negative;
3. Identify the concerned departments or departmental
heads responsible for such variances;
4. Fix responsibilities for the concerned departmental heads towards
achieving certain standards in the
future; and
5. Take
necessary steps wherever required either for achieving the standards or for
modifying the standards.
Therefore, in standard costing the most important
pre-requisite is ‘fixing the standards’ which is actually carried out by the
technical persons. Once the standards are determined, then only different
variances can be calculated by comparing the actual results with the
pre-determined standards. The variances are basically
of two types: (a) Cost Variances and (b) Sales Variances.
Cost
Variances may be of the following four types:
1. Material
Variances
2. Labour
Variances
3. Variable Overhead
Variances
4. Fixed
Overhead Variances
Sales
Variances may be of the following two types:
1. Sales
Turnover Variances
2. Sales Margin
Variances
Standard Costing is also termed as Variance
Analysis because the whole of the Standard Costing System revolves
around calculating the variances and analysing them in order to control
different costs and operations of the business.
Material Variances
1 |
Material Cost Variance |
= M4 – M1 |
2 |
Material Price Variance |
= M2 – M1 |
3 |
Material Usage Variance |
= M4 – M2 |
4 |
Material Mix Variance |
= M3 – M2 |
5 |
Material Yield / Sub-Usage Variance |
= M4 – M3 |
Where,
M1 |
= AP x AQ |
M2 |
= SP x AQ |
M3 |
= SP x AQ in SP |
M4 |
= SP × SQ for AO |
AP |
= Actual Price |
AQ |
= Actual Quantity Consumed |
SP |
= Standard Price |
AQ in SP |
= Actual Quantities of the mix in Standard
Proportion |
SQ for AO |
= Standard Quantities of the mix for Actual
Output |
Note A:
When Price Variance is required to be calculated at
the point of purchase, the purchased quantity itself is considered as the
Actual Quantity (AQ) consumed.
Note B:
When there is no mix of materials in the actual input
i.e. when the direct material consists of only one material, then
1.
Do not calculate M3;
2.
Do not calculate material
mix variance;
3.
Do not calculate material
yield variance.
Note C:
Negative
variances are adverse variances and positive variances are favourable variances.
Check:
1.
Material Cost Variance (M4
– M1)
= Material Price Variance (M2 – M1)
+ Material Usage Variance (M4 – M2)
2.
Material Usage Variance (M4
– M2)
= Material Mix Variance (M3
– M2) + Material Yield Variance (M4 – M3)
Illustration: 1
The
standard and actual figures of product “Z” are as under:
Particulars |
Standard |
Actual |
Material
quantity |
50 units |
45 units |
Material
price p.u. |
Rs 1.00 |
Rs 0.80 |
Calculate:
1.
Material Cost Variance
2.
Material Price Variance
3.
Material Usage Variance
Solution: 1
M1 |
= AP x AQ |
= Rs 0.80 × 45 units |
= Rs 36 |
M2 |
= SP x AQ |
= Rs 1.00 × 45 units |
= Rs 45 |
M4 |
= SP × SQ for AO |
= Rs 1.00 × 50 units |
= Rs 50 |
Variances:
Material
Cost Variance |
=M4 – M1 |
= Rs 50 – Rs 36 |
= Rs 14 |
F |
Material
Price Variance |
=M2 – M1 |
= Rs 45 – Rs 36 |
= Rs 9 |
F |
Material
Usage Variance |
=M4 – M2 |
= Rs 50 – Rs 45 |
= Rs 5 |
F |
Note:
“F” stands for Favourable Variance, and “A” stands for Adverse Variance.
Illustration: 2
NEXT
Manufacturing Concern furnishes the following information:
Particulars |
Standard |
Actual |
Output |
70 kg |
2,10,000 kg |
Material
quantity |
100 kg |
2,80,000 kg |
Material
price p.u. |
Rs 1.00 |
|
Total
material cost |
|
Rs 2,52,000 |
Calculate:
4.
Material Cost Variance
5.
Material Price Variance
6.
Material Usage Variance
Solution: 2
M1 |
= AP x AQ |
|
= Rs 2,52,000 |
M2 |
= SP x AQ |
= Rs 1.00 × 2,80,000 kg |
= Rs 2,80,000 |
M4 |
= SP × SQ for AO |
= Rs 1.00 × 3,00,000 kg |
= Rs 3,00,000 |
Variances:
Mat. Cost Variance |
=M4 – M1 |
=3,00,000 – 2,52,000 |
= Rs 48,000 |
F |
Mat. Price Variance |
=M2 – M1 |
=2,80,000 – 2,52,000 |
= Rs 28,000 |
F |
Mat. Usage Variance |
=M4 – M2 |
=3,00,000 – 2,80,000 |
= Rs 20,000 |
F |
Note:
“F” stands for Favourable Variance, and “A” stands for Adverse Variance.
Workings:
SQ for AO |
= (100 kg ÷ 70 kg) × 2,10,000 kg |
= 3,00,000 kg |
Illustration: 3
The
standard cost of a chemical mixture is as follows:
Standard total material input is 200 kg
40%
material A at Rs 200 per kg
60%
material B at Rs 300 per kg
A
standard loss of 10% of input is expected in production.
The
cost records for a period showed the following usage:
90
kg material A at a cost of Rs 180 per kg
110
kg material B at a cost of Rs 340 per kg
The
quantity produced was 182 kg of good product.
Calculate
all the material variances.
Solution: 3
Analytical Arrangement of Given Data
Material |
Standard |
Actual |
||||
|
Quantity (kg) |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
Quantity (kg) |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
A |
80 |
200 |
16,000 |
90 |
180 |
16,200 |
B |
120 |
300 |
36,000 |
110 |
340 |
37,400 |
Total |
200 |
|
52,000 |
200 |
|
53,600 |
Less: Loss |
20 |
|
|
18 (b/f) |
|
|
|
180 |
|
52,000 |
182 |
|
53,600 |
M1 = AP x AQ
Material |
AP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M1 (Rs) |
A |
180 |
90 |
16,200 |
B |
340 |
110 |
37,400 |
TOTAL |
|
|
53,600 |
M2 = SP x AQ
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M2 (Rs) |
A |
200 |
90 |
18,000 |
B |
300 |
110 |
33,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
51,000 |
M3 = SP x AQ of input in Standard
Proportion
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQSP (Kg) |
M3 (Rs) |
A |
200 |
200
× 40% = 80 |
16,000 |
B |
300 |
200
× 60% = 120 |
36,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
52,000 |
M4 = SP x SQ of input for Actual Output
Material |
SP (Rs) |
SQAO (Kg) |
M4 (Rs) |
A |
200 |
80.89 |
16,178 |
B |
300 |
121.33 |
36,399 |
TOTAL |
|
|
52,577 |
Workings:
Standard quantity of input for actual output (SQAO):
Material
A |
=
(80 ÷ 180) × 182 |
=
80.89 kg |
Material
B |
=
(120 ÷ 180) × 182 |
=
121.33 kg |
VARIANCES:
Variances |
Details |
Rs |
F / A |
Material price variance |
M2 − M1 |
|
|
A |
18,000 – 16,200 |
1,800 |
F |
B |
33,000 – 37,400 |
4,400 |
A |
|
|
2,600 |
A |
Material usage variance |
M4 − M2 |
|
|
A |
16,178 – 18,000 |
1,822 |
A |
B |
36,399 – 33,000 |
3,399 |
F |
|
|
1,577 |
F |
Material mix variance |
M3 – M2 |
|
|
A |
16,000 – 18,000 |
2,000 |
A |
B |
36,000 – 33,000 |
3,000 |
F |
|
|
1,000 |
F |
Material yield variance |
M4 – M3 |
|
|
A |
16,178 – 16,000 |
178 |
F |
B |
36,399 – 36,000 |
399 |
F |
|
|
577 |
F |
Material cost variance |
M4 – M1 |
|
|
A |
16,178 – 16,200 |
22 |
A |
B |
36,399 – 37,400 |
1,001 |
A |
|
|
1,023 |
A |
Illustration: 4
SV
Ltd. manufactures BXE by mixing 3 raw materials. For every batch of 100 kg of
BXE, 125 kg of raw materials are used. In April 2012, 60 batches were prepared
to produce an output of 5600 kg of BXE. The standard and actual particulars for
April, 2012 are as under:
|
Standard |
Actual |
|
||
Raw
material |
Mix (%)-age |
Price
per kg (Rs) |
Mix (%)-age |
Price
per kg (Rs) |
Quantity
of raw materials purchased (kg) |
A |
50 |
20 |
60 |
21 |
5,000 |
B |
30 |
10 |
20 |
8 |
2,000 |
C |
20 |
5 |
20 |
6 |
1,000 |
Solution: 4
For a standard batch of 100 kg of output (BXE),
standard quantity of raw materials required is 125 kg. Therefor, for 60
standard batches of output, standard raw materials required = 125 × 60 = 7,500
kg.
Analytical Arrangement of Given Data
Material |
Standard |
Actual |
||||
|
Quantity |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
Quantity |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
A |
3,750 |
20 |
75,000 |
4,500 |
21 |
94,500 |
B |
2,250 |
10 |
22,500 |
1,500 |
8 |
12,000 |
C |
1,500 |
5 |
7,500 |
1,500 |
6 |
9,000 |
Total |
7,500 |
|
1,05,000 |
7,500 |
|
1,15,500 |
Less: Loss |
1,500 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
Output |
6,000 |
|
1,05,000 |
5,600 |
|
1,15,500 |
M1 = AP x AQ
Material |
AP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M1 (Rs) |
A |
21 |
4,500 |
94,500 |
B |
8 |
1,500 |
12,000 |
C |
6 |
1,500 |
9,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
1,15,500 |
M2 = SP x AQ
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M2 (Rs) |
A |
20 |
4,500 |
90,000 |
B |
10 |
1,500 |
15,000 |
C |
5 |
1,500 |
7,500 |
TOTAL |
|
|
1,12,500 |
M3 = SP x AQ of input in Standard
Proportion
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQSP (Kg) |
M2 (Rs) |
A |
20 |
3,750 |
75,000 |
B |
10 |
2,250 |
22,500 |
C |
5 |
1,500 |
7,500 |
TOTAL |
|
|
1,05,000 |
M4 = SP x SQ of input for Actual Output
Material |
SP (Rs) |
SQAO (Kg) |
M4 (Rs) |
A |
20 |
3,500 |
70,000 |
B |
10 |
2,100 |
21,000 |
C |
5 |
1,400 |
7,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
98,000 |
Working:
Standard quantity of input for actual output (SQAO):
Material
A |
=
(3,750 ÷ 6,000) × 5,600 |
=
3,500 kg |
Material
B |
=
(2,250 ÷ 6,000) × 5,600 |
=
2,100 kg |
Material
C |
=
(1,500 ÷ 6,000) × 5,600 |
=
1,400 kg |
VARIANCES:
Variances |
Details |
Rs |
F / A |
Material price variance |
M2 − M1 |
|
|
A |
90,000 – 94,500 |
4,500 |
A |
B |
15,000 – 12,000 |
3,000 |
F |
C |
7,500 – 9,000 |
1,500 |
A |
|
|
3,000 |
A |
Material usage variance |
M4 − M2 |
|
|
A |
70,000 – 90,000 |
20,000 |
A |
B |
21,000 – 15,000 |
6,000 |
F |
C |
7,000 – 7,500 |
500 |
A |
|
|
14,500 |
A |
Material mix variance |
M3 – M2 |
|
|
A |
75,000 – 90,000 |
15,000 |
A |
B |
22,500 – 15,000 |
7,500 |
F |
C |
7,500 – 7,500 |
- |
- |
|
|
7,500 |
A |
Material yield variance |
M4 – M3 |
|
|
A |
70,000 – 75,000 |
5,000 |
A |
B |
21,000 – 22,500 |
1,500 |
A |
C |
7,000 – 7,500 |
500 |
A |
|
|
7,000 |
A |
Material cost variance |
M4 – M1 |
|
|
A |
70,000 – 94,500 |
24,500 |
A |
B |
21,000 – 12,000 |
9,000 |
F |
C |
7,000 – 9,000 |
2,000 |
A |
|
|
17,500 |
A |
Illustration: 5
A brass foundry making
castings which are transferred to the machine shop of the company at standard
price uses a standard costing system. Standards in regard to the input materials
stocks of which are kept at standard prices are as follows:
Standard Mixture: 70% Copper
and 30% Zinc
Standard Price: Copper Rs 2,400 per
ton and Zinc Rs 650 per ton
Standard loss in melt: 5%
of input
Actual figures in respect
of a costing period are as follows:
Commencing stocks: Copper
100 tons and Zinc 60 tons
Finished stock: Copper 110
tons and Zinc 50 tons
Purchases during the
period:
Copper 300 tons costing Rs
7, 32,500
Zinc 100 tons costing Rs 62,500
Metal melted 400 tons.
Casting produced 375 tons.
Calculate
all the material variances.
Solution: 5
Computation of Actual Quantity (AQ)
and Actual Cost (M1)
Particulars |
Copper |
Zinc |
||
|
Quantity (tons) |
Value (Rs) |
Quantity (tons) |
Value (Rs) |
Opening stock |
100 |
2,40,000 |
60 |
39,000 |
ADD: Purchases |
300 |
7,32,500 |
100 |
62,500 |
|
400 |
9,72,500 |
160 |
1,01,500 |
LESS: Closing stock |
110 |
2,64,000 |
50 |
32,500 |
Actual quantity (AQ) |
290 |
7,08,500 |
110 |
69,000 |
Analytical Arrangement of Given Data
Material |
Standard |
Actual |
||||
|
Quantity (tons) |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
Quantity (tons) |
Price (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
Copper |
280 |
2,400 |
6,72,000 |
290 |
|
7,08,500 |
Zinc |
120 |
650 |
78,000 |
110 |
|
69,000 |
Total |
400 |
|
7,50,000 |
400 |
|
7,77,500 |
Less: Loss |
20 |
|
|
25 (b/f) |
|
|
|
380 |
|
7,50,000 |
375 |
|
7,77,500 |
M1 = AP x AQ
Material |
AP (Rs) |
AQ (tons) |
M1 (Rs) |
Copper |
|
|
7,08,500 |
Zinc |
|
|
69,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,77,500 |
M2 = SP x AQ
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQ (tons) |
M2 (Rs) |
Copper |
2,400 |
290 |
6,96,000
|
Zinc |
650 |
110 |
71,500 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,67,500 |
M3 = SP x AQ of input in Standard
Proportion
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQSP (tons) |
M2 (Rs) |
Copper |
2,400 |
280 |
6,72,000 |
Zinc |
650 |
120 |
78,000 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,50,000 |
M4 = SP x SQ of input for Actual Output
Material |
SP (Rs) |
SQAO (tons) |
M4 (Rs) |
Copper |
2,400 |
276.32 |
6,63,168 |
Zinc |
650 |
118.42 |
76,973 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,40,141 |
Workings:
Standard quantity of input for actual output (SQAO):
Copper |
=
(280 ÷ 380) × 375 |
=
276.32 tons |
Zinc |
=
(120 ÷ 380) × 375 |
=
118.42 tons |
VARIANCES:
Variances |
Details |
Rs |
F / A |
Material price variance |
M2 − M1 |
|
|
Copper |
6,96,000 – 7,08,500 |
12,500 |
A |
Zinc |
71,500 – 69,000 |
2,500 |
F |
|
|
10,000 |
A |
Material usage variance |
M4 − M2 |
|
|
Copper |
6,63,168 – 6,96,000 |
32,832 |
A |
Zinc |
76,973 – 71,500 |
5,473 |
F |
|
|
27,359 |
A |
Material mix variance |
M3 – M2 |
|
|
Copper |
6,72,000 – 6,96,000 |
24,000 |
A |
Zinc |
78,000 – 71,500 |
6,500 |
F |
|
|
17,500 |
A |
Material yield variance |
M4 – M3 |
|
|
Copper |
6,63,168 – 6,72,000 |
8,832 |
A |
Zinc |
76,973 – 78,000 |
1,027 |
A |
|
|
9,859 |
A |
Material cost variance |
M4 – M1 |
|
|
Copper |
6,63,168 – 7,08,500 |
45,332 |
A |
Zinc |
76,973 – 69,000 |
7,973 |
F |
|
|
37,359 |
A |
Illustration: 6
A
company manufacturing a special type of fencing tile of dimensions 12” X 8” X
1/2” used a system of standard costing. The standard mix of the compound used
for making the tiles is:
1,200
kg of Material A @ Rs 0.30
per kg
500 kg of Material B @ Rs 0.60 per kg
800 kg of Material C @ Rs 0.70 per kg
The compound should produce 12,000 square feet of tiles
of 1/2” thickness.
During a period in which 1, 00,000 tiles of the
standard size were produced, the material usage was:
Material |
Quantity (kg) |
Price per kg (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
A |
7,000 |
0.32 |
2,240 |
B |
3,000 |
0.65 |
1,950 |
C |
5,000 |
0.75 |
3,750 |
Total |
15,000 |
|
7,940 |
Present
the cost figures for the period showing Material Price, Mixture, and Sub-usage
Variance.
Solution: 6
Standard size of a tile |
= 12” × 8” × ½” |
|
= 96 square inch of area × ½” of thickness |
|
= (96 ÷ 144) square feet of area × ½” of thickness |
|
= 2/3 square feet of area × ½” of thickness |
Therefore, number of tiles for an
area of (12,000 square feet × ½” of thickness)
= 12,000 ÷ 2/3 = 12,000 × 3/2 =
18,000
Therefore, standards for 18,000 tiles:
Material |
Quantity (kg) |
Price per kg (Rs) |
A |
1,200 |
0.30 |
B |
500 |
0.60 |
C |
800 |
0.70 |
Therefore, standards for 1, 00,000
tiles:
Material |
Quantity (kg) |
Price per kg (Rs) |
Value (Rs) |
A |
6,667 |
0.30 |
2,000 |
B |
2,778 |
0.60 |
1,667 |
C |
4,444 |
0.70 |
3,111 |
Total |
13,889 |
|
6,778 |
M1 = AP x AQ
Material |
AP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M1 (Rs) |
A |
0.32 |
7,000 |
2,240 |
B |
0.65 |
3,000 |
1,950 |
C |
0.75 |
5,000 |
3,750 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,940 |
M2 = SP x AQ
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQ (Kg) |
M2 (Rs) |
A |
0.30 |
7,000 |
2,100 |
B |
0.60 |
3,000 |
1,800 |
C |
0.70 |
5,000 |
3,500 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,400 |
M3 = SP x AQ of input in Standard
Proportion
Material |
SP (Rs) |
AQSP (Kg) |
M2 (Rs) |
A |
0.30 |
7,200 |
2,160 |
B |
0.60 |
3,000 |
1,800 |
C |
0.70 |
4,800 |
3,360 |
TOTAL |
|
|
7,320 |
M4 = SP x SQ of input for Actual Output
Material |
SP (Rs) |
SQAO (Kg) |
M4 (Rs) |
A |
0.30 |
6,667 |
2,000 |
B |
0.60 |
2,778 |
1,667 |
C |
0.70 |
4,444 |
3,111 |
TOTAL |
|
|
6,778 |
Workings:
Actual Quantity of input in Standard Proportion
(AQSP):
Material
A |
=
(6,667 ÷ 13,889) × 15,000 |
=
7,200 kg |
Material
B |
=
(2,778 ÷ 13,889) × 15,000 |
=
3,000 kg |
Material
C |
=
(4,444 ÷ 13,889) × 15,000 |
=
4,800 kg |
Standard quantity of input for actual output (SQAO):
Material
A |
|
6,667
kg |
Material
B |
|
2,778
kg |
Material
C |
|
4,444
kg |
VARIANCES:
Variances |
Details |
Rs |
F / A |
Material price variance |
M2 − M1 |
|
|
A |
2,100 – 2,240 |
140 |
A |
B |
1,800 – 1,950 |
150 |
A |
C |
3,500 – 3,750 |
250 |
A |
|
|
540 |
A |
Material usage variance |
M4 − M2 |
|
|
A |
2,000 – 2,100 |
100 |
A |
B |
1,667 – 1,800 |
133 |
A |
C |
3,111 – 3,500 |
389 |
A |
|
|
622 |
A |
Material mix variance |
M3 – M2 |
|
|
A |
2,160 – 2,100 |
60 |
F |
B |
1,800 – 1,800 |
- |
- |
C |
3,360 – 3,500 |
140 |
A |
|
|
80 |
A |
Material yield variance |
M4 – M3 |
|
|
A |
2,000 – 2,160 |
160 |
A |
B |
1,667 – 1,800 |
133 |
A |
C |
3,111 – 3,360 |
249 |
A |
|
|
542 |
A |
Material cost variance |
M4 – M1 |
|
|
A |
2,000 – 2,240 |
240 |
A |
B |
1,667 – 1,950 |
283 |
A |
C |
3,111 – 3,750 |
639 |
A |
|
|
1,162 |
A |
Illustration: 7
The standard set for
material consumption was 100 kg. @ Rs 2.25
per kg.
In
a cost period:
Opening
stock was 100 kg. @ Rs 2.25 per kg.
Purchases
made 500 kg. @ Rs 2.15 per kg.
Consumption:
110 kg
Calculate:
(a) Usage, and (b) Price Variances
1)
When variance is
calculated at point of purchase
2)
When variance is
calculated at point of issue on FIFO basis
3)
When
variance is calculated at point of issue on LIFO basis
Solution: 7
1. When
variance is calculated at point of purchase
M1 |
= AP × AQ |
= 2.15 × 500 |
= 1,075 |
M2
(For Price V.) |
= SP × AQ |
= 2.25 × 500 |
= 1,125 |
M2
(For Usage V.) |
= SP × AQ |
= 2.25 × 110 |
= 247.50 |
M4 |
= SP × SQAO |
= 2.25 × 100 |
= 225 |
Mat. Price V. |
= M2 –
M1 |
= 1,125 – 1,075 |
= 50 (F) |
Mat. Usage V. |
= M4 –
M2 |
= 225 – 247.50 |
= 22.50 (A) |
2. When variance
is calculated at point of issue on FIFO basis
M1 |
= AP × AQ |
= 2.25 × 100 +
2.15 × 10 |
= 246.50 |
M2 |
= SP × AQ |
= 2.25 × 110 |
= 247.50 |
M4 |
= SP × SQAO |
= 2.25 × 100 |
= 225 |
Mat. Price V. |
= M2 –
M1 |
= 247.50 – 246.50 |
= 1 (F) |
Mat. Usage V. |
= M4 –
M2 |
= 225 – 247.50 |
= 22.50 (A) |
3. When
variance is calculated at point of issue on LIFO basis
M1 |
= AP × AQ |
= 2.15 × 110 |
= 236.50 |
M2 |
= SP × AQ |
= 2.25 × 110 |
= 247.50 |
M4 |
= SP × SQAO |
= 2.25 × 100 |
= 225 |
Mat. Price V. |
= M2 –
M1 |
= 247.50 – 236.50 |
= 11 (F) |
Mat. Usage V. |
= M4 –
M2 |
= 225 – 247.50 |
= 22.50 (A) |
Important
note:
When Price Variance is required to be calculated at the point of purchase, the purchased quantity itself is considered as the Actual Quantity (AQ) consumed.
I read this article thoroughly and i understood each and everything. It was very informative which hepled me alot in my preparation for my last examinations. I would like to have more such sort of aticles with same quality from this blog. Further i also want my friends to follow this blog for good quality preparations for their future exams. :)
ReplyDeleteThank you Utsav for your comments. I assure you of publishing more such students-friendly quality articles on different topics of various subjects of CMA and other professional courses.
DeleteThis airtcle was very helpful . I want to more this type of airlcle publish in this blog.
ReplyDeleteThank you Subhadip for your comments. I assure you of publishing more such students-friendly quality articles on different topics of various subjects of CMA and other professional courses.
DeleteIt was very helpful to me.
ReplyDeleteThe article was good to read
ReplyDeleteThis blog is extremely helpful for students like me who wants to build a clear and strong concept about Standard Costing and also for preparation of CMA exams. Written in simple terms and easily understandable. Thank You Sir.
ReplyDelete