Cost Accounting
PROCESS COSTING
Definition
Process costing is a method of cost accounting whereby costs
are charged to processes or operations and averaged over units produced. In an
industry where production of similar units is carried on continuously through a
series of processes or operations, the most appropriate method of cost
accounting will be process costing. Process costing is that form of operation
costing which is applicable in a production system where standardized goods are
produced.
Examples of industries employing process costing
are industries producing steam, gas, electricity, ice, steel, paper, cement,
rubber, medicine, sugar, bread, etc. Petroleum and fertilizer industries also
employ process costing as a method of cost accounting.
Types of Problems
Basically, three types of problems are required
to be solved in process costing as follows:
- Problems
requiring preparation of Process Accounts involving Normal
Loss, Abnormal Loss and Abnormal Gain;
- Problems
requiring preparation of Process Accounts involving Valuation
of Work-in-progress with the help of Equivalent Production Units;
and
- Problems
requiring preparation of Process Accounts involving Inter-Process
Profit.
Process accounts are prepared for each of the
processes. If there are three processes A, B and C, three process accounts will
be prepared: Process ‘A a/c’, Process ‘B a/c’ and Process ‘C a/c’. Moreover,
process accounts are prepared for a particular period which may be a month or a
year, etc. Normally, output of one process (if not sold in the market) is the
input of the next process. Output of the last process is transferred to the
Finished Goods Store from where these are finally sold in the market.
Accordingly, a Finished Goods a/c is also prepared for keeping accounting
control on all the finished goods.
Normal Loss,
Abnormal Loss and Abnormal Gain
The amount of loss which is unavoidable owing to
the nature of raw materials used, nature of production techniques applied, etc
is considered as normal loss. For example, in the manufacture of certain product
the components of which are made out of a sheet of metal, some waste of the
same metal is unavoidable. Similarly, there are instances of evaporation,
shrinkage, loss in melting, etc which also cannot be avoided. These are the
types of losses termed as normal loss.
But practically, quantity of normal loss out of
a process is calculated by applying some estimated percentage on the quantity
of total input of the process. The estimated percentage is actually an industry
standard which is calculated and fixed by the concerned technical experts
belonging to the same industry.
If the total output of a process is less than
the difference between total input and normal loss, the quantity of shortage in
output is called abnormal loss.
Abnormal Loss = (Total
Input − Normal Loss) − Total Output.
On the other hand, if the total output of a
process is more than the difference between total input and normal loss, the
quantity of excess output is called abnormal gain.
Abnormal Gain = Total
Output − (Total Input − Normal Loss).
Valuation of
Normal Loss
Valuation of normal loss as such is not done
because normal loss is borne by the good units produced. If normal loss has any
realizable scrap value, such value is credited to the Process a/c in which the
said normal loss has occurred.
Valuation of
Abnormal Loss, Abnormal Gain and Process Output
For valuation of abnormal loss and abnormal
gain, first of all the process cost per unit is calculated and then the value
of abnormal loss and value of abnormal gain are determined as follows:
Process cost per unit = (cost
of total input − realizable value of normal loss) ÷ (quantity of total input −
quantity of normal loss).
[Assuming
no opening or closing work-in-progress]
Value of abnormal loss = process cost per unit x quantity of abnormal
loss.
Value of abnormal gain = process cost per unit x quantity of abnormal
gain.
Similarly, the value of total output of a
process which is normally transferred to the next process is also calculated as follows:
Value of total output of a process
= Process cost per unit x Quantity of total
output of the process.
PREPARATION OF ACCOUNTS
− Process a/c, Normal Loss a/c,
Abnormal Loss a/c and Abnormal Gain a/c
PROCESS A/C
Debit side of a Process a/c may have ―
i.
Opening work-in-progress,
ii.
Cost of different inputs (e.g. material cost, labour cost and other
overhead costs), and
iii.
Abnormal gain.
Credit side of a Process a/c may have ―
i.
Normal loss,
ii.
Abnormal loss,
iii.
Transfer to next process or transfer to finished goods store, and
iv.
Closing work-in-progress.
Format of a Process A/c
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Opening WIP |
|
|
By Normal loss |
|
|
To Materials |
|
|
By Abnormal loss |
|
|
To Labour |
|
|
By Transfer to next
process (or finished goods store) |
|
|
To Direct expenses |
|
|
By Closing WIP |
|
|
To Overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
To Abnormal gain |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
In the debit side input units will be put only
against Opening WIP, Materials and Abnormal Gain (if any) but input costs will
be put against all the items. In the credit side units will be put
against all the items but costs will be put against all the items excepting
Normal Loss. Against Normal Loss only the realizable value of normal loss (if
any) will be put.
NORMAL LOSS A/C
Debit side of Normal Loss A/c will have all the transfer
entries from the Process A/cs along with corresponding units and realizable
values of normal loss. Credit side of Normal Loss A/c will
have realization from Normal Loss (by sale of scrap) along with corresponding
units. Credit side will also have Abnormal Gains along with corresponding units
and values at the rate of corresponding realizable value of normal loss.
ABNORMAL LOSS A/C
Debit side of Abnormal Loss A/c will have all the transfer
entries from the Process A/cs along with corresponding units and values of
abnormal loss. Credit side of Abnormal Loss A/c will have realization from
Abnormal Loss (by sale of scrap) along with corresponding units and values
either at the rate of corresponding realizable value of normal loss or at any
other given rate. The balance of this a/c will be transferred to Costing Profit
and Loss A/c by the following journal entry:
Costing
Profit and Loss A/c................... Dr
To Abnormal Loss A/c
ABNORMAL GAIN A/C
Debit side of Abnormal Gain A/c will have all the transfer
entries from the Normal Loss A/c along with corresponding units and values. Credit
side of Abnormal Gain A/c will have all the transfer entries from the
Process A/cs along with corresponding units and values. The balance of this a/c
will be transferred to Costing Profit and Loss A/c by the following journal
entry:
Abnormal Gain A/c.............................. Dr
To
Costing Profit and Loss A/c
Structure of Normal Loss A/c, Abnormal Loss A/c, and Abnormal Gain A/c
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To |
|
|
By |
|
|
To |
|
|
By |
|
|
To |
|
|
By |
|
|
To |
|
|
By |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
Valuation of
Work-in-progress with the help of Equivalent Production Units
In process industries where process costing is
applied, it is obvious that at the end of each cost period there may be certain
incomplete goods at various stages of completion. For example, certain goods
may be 75% completed, certain goods may be 50% completed, certain goods may be
only 20% completed, etc. The stage of completion can be determined on the basis
of machine-hours or labour-hours. Suppose, 100 machine-hours are required to
complete a particular process, but the process has utilized only 70
machine-hours up to the end of the cost period. The process may be said to be
70% completed.
For the purpose of valuation of
work-in-progress, the actual number of incomplete physical units in progress is
substituted by number of notionally completed units taking into consideration
the degree of completion. 300 incomplete physical units at the stage of 50%
completion shall be substituted by 150 notionally completed units. This is
known as the concept of equivalent production.
Steps / Formats
for Valuation of
Abnormal Loss,
Abnormal Gain, Finished Goods and Work-in-progress
The steps for valuation of abnormal loss,
finished goods and work-in-progress are as follows:
(i) Preparation of
Statement Showing Equivalent Production Units,
(ii) Preparation of
Statement Showing Element-wise Cost per Unit, and
(iii) Preparation of
Statement Showing Value of Finished Goods, Work-in-progress, etc.
VALUATION UNDER FIFO METHOD
Statement Showing
Equivalent Production Units
Details |
Input units |
Output units |
Material A |
Material B |
Labour & OH |
|||
%-age completion |
Equiv units |
%-age completion |
Equiv units |
%-age completion |
Equiv units |
|||
Opening WIP |
××× |
××× |
|
|
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Introduced |
××× |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced and Finished |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
100 |
××× |
100 |
××× |
Normal Loss |
|
××× |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abnormal Loss |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
100 |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Closing WIP |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Abnormal Gain |
|
(×××) |
100 |
(×××) |
100 |
(×××) |
100 |
(×××) |
TOTAL |
××× |
××× |
|
××× |
|
××× |
|
××× |
Material A = Transfer
from the previous process
Material B = Addition in the current process
Statement Showing
Element-wise Cost Per Unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (Rs) |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Material A (Transferred from the previous
process) |
××× |
|
|
Less: Realisation from normal loss |
××× |
|
|
|
××× |
××× |
××× |
Material B (Added in the current process) |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Labour (Added in the current process) |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Overhead (Added in the current process) |
××× |
××× |
××× |
TOTAL |
××× |
|
××× |
Important Note:
It is a convention that the
scrap value of normal loss should be deducted from the cost of materials and
more specifically from the cost of materials transferred from the previous
process, if any.
Statement Showing Value of
Finished Goods, Work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Opening WIP (Transferred from previous period) |
− |
− |
− |
− |
××× |
Opening WIP (Finished during the current period) |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
− ××× ××× ××× |
− ××× ××× ××× |
− ××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Finished goods transferred to the next process or finished goods store |
|
|
|
|
××× |
Abnormal loss |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Closing WIP |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Abnormal gain |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× ××× |
(×××) |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
××× |
VALUATION UNDER AVERAGE METHOD
Statement Showing
Equivalent Production Units
Details |
Input Units |
Output Units |
Material |
Labour & OH |
||
%-age Completion |
Equivalent Units |
%-age Completion |
Equivalent Units |
|||
Opening WIP |
××× |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
××× |
|
|
|
|
|
Finished & Transferred |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
100 |
××× |
Normal Loss |
|
××× |
|
|
|
|
Abnormal Loss |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Closing WIP |
|
××× |
100 |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Abnormal Gain |
|
(×××) |
100 |
(×××) |
100 |
(×××) |
TOTAL |
××× |
××× |
|
××× |
|
××× |
Statement Showing
Element-wise Cost Per Unit
Cost Elements |
Opening WIP (Rs) |
Period cost (Rs) |
Total cost (Rs) |
Equivalent units |
Cost p.u. (Rs) |
Material |
××× |
××× |
××× |
|
|
Less: Realisation from
normal loss |
|
××× |
××× |
|
|
|
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Labour |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Overhead |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
TOTAL |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Statement Showing Value of
Finished Goods, Work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Finished goods transferred to the next process or finished goods store |
Material Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Abnormal loss |
Material Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× |
Abnormal gain |
Material Labour Overhead |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
××× ××× ××× |
(×××) |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
××× |
Important Note:
If in the problem %-age
completion of opening work-in-progress is given, FIFO method is to be followed.
On the other hand, if %-age completion of opening work-in-progress is not
given, AVERAGE method is to be followed. If %-age completion of opening
work-in-progress is given, then also AVERAGE method can be followed (if it is
asked for in the problem), but the only thing is, in that case %-age completion
of opening work-in-progress has to be ignored.
Inter-Process
Profit
Some process industries transfer the finished
goods from one process to the next process at a price above cost. The excess of
the transfer price over cost represents inter-process profit. The last process
also transfers the finished goods to finished goods store at a price higher
than cost. So all processes, including the last process, make profit from the
transfer of products / outputs to the subsequent process or finished goods
store. This profit is called inter-process profit. The profit margin is fixed
at certain percent on transfer price or at certain percent on cost.
The standard format of Process A/cs when output
of one process is transferred to the next process at cost plus profit margin is
as follows:
Format of a Process A/c
(Inter-Process Profit)
Particulars |
Total (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Profit (Rs) |
Particulars |
Total (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Profit (Rs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Important Points
related to preparation of Process A/cs
Involving
Inter-Process Profit
1. Cost of Closing Stock of the
Transferee Process
= Value
of Closing Stock of the Transferee Process x [Cost Column total of the Transferee
Process ÷ Total of the Total Column (excluding profit) of the Transferee
Process].
2. Unrealized Profit in the Stock
of the Transferee Process
= Value of Closing Stock of the Transferee
Process − Cost of Closing Stock of the Transferee Process.
= [Transfer Price to Transferee Process ÷ Total
of the Total Column (excluding profit) of the Transferee Process] x Value of
Closing Stock of the Transferee Process x %-age of profit made by the
Transferor Process on the Transfer Price.
3. If the Closing Stock of the Transferee Process is valued at Prime
Cost in spite of the presence of
overhead, then for the purpose of the above formulae,
Total of the Total Column
(excluding profit) of the Transferee Process
= Transfer Price to Transferee Process + Direct
Material Cost of the Transferee Process
+ Direct Labour Cost of the
Transferee Process + Direct Expenses of the Transferee Process.
Statement showing actually realised
profit
Statement showing actually
realised profit
|
Apparent profit (Rs) |
ADD: Unrealised profit in op. Stock (Rs) |
LESS: Unrealised profit in cl. Stock (Rs) |
Actual profit (Rs) |
Process: I |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Process: II |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Process: III |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Finished stock |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
TOTAL |
××× |
××× |
××× |
××× |
Valuation of closing stock for balance
sheet purpose
Valuation of closing stock for balance
sheet purpose
|
Amount from cost column (Rs) |
Closing stock of process:
I (at cost) |
××× |
Closing stock of process:
II (at cost) |
××× |
Closing stock of process:
III (at cost) |
××× |
Closing stock of finished
stock account (at cost) |
××× |
TOTAL |
××× |
Illustration: 1
A product passes through three processes P, Q and R. The details of expenses incurred on the three processes during the year 2019 were as under:
Particulars |
P |
Q |
R |
Units issued |
10,000 |
|
|
Cost per unit (Rs) |
100 |
|
|
Sundry materials (Rs) |
10,000 |
15,000 |
5,000 |
Labour (Rs) |
30,000 |
80,000 |
65,000 |
Direct expenses (Rs) |
6,000 |
18,150 |
27,200 |
Sale price of output per unit (Rs) |
120 |
165 |
250 |
Management expenses during the year amounted to Rs 80,000 and selling
expenses were Rs 50,000. Both these are not allocable to the processes. Actual
outputs of the three processes were as under:
Process P – 9,300 units; Process Q – 5,400 units; Process R – 2,100 units.
2/3rd of the output of Process P and ½ of the output of
Process Q was passed on to the next process and the balances were sold. The
entire output of Process R was sold. The normal percentage of wastage of the
three processes calculated on the input of every process was:
Process P – 5%; Process Q – 15%; Process R – 20%. The wastage of Process P was sold at Rs 2 per unit, that of Process Q at Rs 5 per unit and that of Process R at Rs 10 per unit.
Prepare the three process accounts and a statement of income for 2019
showing fully the accounting treatment of process wastage.
Solution: 1
Process: P Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Input (Direct materials) |
10,000 |
10,00,000 |
By Normal loss (5% of 10,000 units) |
500 |
1,000 |
To Sundry materials |
|
10,000 |
By Abnormal loss (balance quantity) |
200 |
22,000 |
To Labour |
|
30,000 |
By Transfer to Process: Q |
6,200 |
6,82,000 |
To Direct expenses |
|
6,000 |
By Transfer to F.G. Stock |
3,100 |
3,41,000 |
|
10,000 |
10,46,000 |
|
10,000 |
10,46,000 |
Process cost per unit = (Rs 10, 46,000 – Rs 1,000) ÷ (10,000 units – 500 units) = Rs 110
Process: Q Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Transfer from Process: P |
6,200 |
6,82,000 |
By Normal loss (15% of 6,200 units) |
930 |
4,650 |
To Sundry materials |
|
15,000 |
By Transfer to Process: R |
2,700 |
4,05,000 |
To Labour |
|
80,000 |
By Transfer to F.G. Stock |
2,700 |
4,05,000 |
To Direct expenses |
|
18,150 |
|
|
|
To Abnormal gain (balance quantity) |
130 |
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
6,330 |
8,14,650 |
|
6,330 |
8,14,650 |
Process cost per unit = (Rs 7, 95,150 – Rs 4,650) ÷ (6,200 units – 930 units) = Rs 150
Process: R Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Transfer from Process: Q |
2,700 |
4,05,000 |
By Normal loss (20% of 2,700 units) |
540 |
5,400 |
To Sundry materials |
|
5,000 |
By Abnormal loss (balance quantity) |
60 |
13,800 |
To Labour |
|
65,000 |
By Transfer to F.G. Stock |
2,100 |
4,83,000 |
To Direct expenses |
|
27,200 |
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
5,02,200 |
|
2,700 |
5,02,200 |
Process cost per unit = (Rs 5, 02,200 – Rs 5,400) ÷ (2,700 units – 540 units) = Rs 230
Normal Loss Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Process P |
500 |
1,000 |
By Bank |
500 |
1,000 |
To Process Q |
930 |
4,650 |
By Bank |
800 |
4,000 |
To Process R |
540 |
5,400 |
By Abnormal gain |
130 |
650 |
|
|
|
By Bank |
540 |
5,400 |
|
1,970 |
11,050 |
|
1,970 |
11,050 |
Abnormal Loss Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Process P |
200 |
22,000 |
By Bank |
200 |
400 |
To Process R |
60 |
13,800 |
By Bank |
60 |
600 |
|
|
|
By Costing P/L A/c |
|
34,800 |
|
260 |
35,800 |
|
260 |
35,800 |
Abnormal Gain Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Normal loss |
130 |
650 |
By Process Q |
130 |
19,500 |
To Costing P/L A/c |
|
18,850 |
|
|
|
|
130 |
19,500 |
|
130 |
19,500 |
Costing Profit and Loss Account
Particulars |
Rs |
Rs |
Particulars |
Rs |
Rs |
To Cost of sales: |
|
|
By Sales: |
|
|
Process P |
3,41,000 |
|
Process P (3,100 x 120) |
3,72,000 |
|
Process Q |
4,05,000 |
|
Process Q (2,700 x 165) |
4,45,500 |
|
Process R |
4,83,000 |
12,29,000 |
Process R (2,100 x 250) |
5,25,000 |
13,42,500 |
To Management exp. |
|
80,000 |
By Abnormal gain |
|
18,850 |
To Selling exp. |
|
50,000 |
By Net loss |
|
32,450 |
To Abnormal loss |
|
34,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,93,800 |
|
|
13,93,800 |
Illustration: 2
A product passes through three processes— A, B and C.
10,000 units at a cost of Rs 1.10 were issued to Process A. The other
direct expenses were as follows:
|
PROCESS-A |
PROCESS-B |
PROCESS-C |
Sundry
materials (Rs) |
1,500 |
1,500 |
1,500 |
Direct labour
(Rs) |
4,500 |
8,000 |
6,500 |
Direct
expenses (Rs) |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,503 |
The wastage of process ‘A’ was 5% and in process ‘B’ 4%
The wastage of process ‘A’ was sold
at Rs 0.25 per unit and that of ‘B’ at Rs 0.50 per unit and that of C at Rs 1.00
per unit.
The overhead
charges were 160% of direct labour. The final product was sold at Rs 10 per
unit fetching a profit of 20% on sales. Find out the percentage of wastage in
Process ‘C’.
Solution: 2
Process ‘A’ Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Direct materials (10,000 × Rs 1.10) |
10,000 |
11,000 |
By Normal loss (5% of 10,000 × Rs 0.25) |
500 |
125 |
To Other direct materials |
|
1,500 |
By Transfer to Process ‘B’ |
9,500 |
25,075 |
To Direct labour |
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
To Direct expenses |
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
To Overheads (4,500 × 160%) |
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
25,200 |
|
10,000 |
25,200 |
Process ‘B’ Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Transfer from Process ‘A’ |
9,500 |
25,075 |
By Normal loss (4% of 9,500 × Rs 0.50) |
380 |
190 |
To Other direct materials |
|
1,500 |
By Transfer to Process ‘C’ |
9,120 |
48,185 |
To Direct labour |
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
To Direct expenses |
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
To Overheads (8,000 × 160%) |
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
|
9,500 |
48,375 |
|
9,500 |
48,375 |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Transfer from Process ‘B’ |
9,120 |
48,185 |
By Normal loss (7.63% of 9,120 × Rs 1) |
696 |
696 |
To Other direct materials |
|
1,500 |
By Transfer to Finished Stock A/c (@ Rs 8 p.u) |
8,424 |
67,392 |
To Direct labour |
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
To Direct expenses |
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
To Overheads (6,500 × 160%) |
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
|
9,120 |
68,088 |
|
9,120 |
68,088 |
Working note:
|
Rs |
Selling price per unit |
10 |
LESS: Profit per unit (20% of ` 10) |
2 |
Cost price of finished stock per unit |
8 |
Let percentage of normal wastage of Process ‘C’ = w%
∴ According to the problem,
68,088 = (9,120 × w% × Rs 1) + (9,120 – 9,120 × w %) × Rs 8
⇒ 68,088 = 91.2w + (9,120 – 91.2w) × 8
⇒ 68,088 = 91.2w + 72,960 – 729.6w
⇒ 729.6w – 91.2w = 72,960 – 68,088
⇒ 638.4w = 4,872
⇒ w = 7.63 (approx)
∴ Percentage of normal wastage of Process ‘C’ = 7.63%
Illustration: 3
From the following information compute (i) Equivalent production (ii) statement of apportionment of cost, (iii) prepare Process Account.
Opening WIP |
200 units @ Rs 4 per unit |
Stages of completion: |
Material – 100%; Labour and
Overheads – 40% |
Units introduced |
1,050 units |
Units transferred to next process |
1,100 units |
Closing WIP |
150 units |
Stages of completion: |
Material – 100%; Labour and
Overheads – 70% |
Other information:
Particulars |
Rs |
Material cost |
1,050 |
Labour |
2,250 |
Production overheads |
1,125 |
Total |
4,425 |
Solution: 3
Statement showing equivalent production (Units) under
FIFO method
Details |
Input (Units) |
Output (Units) |
Materials |
Labour |
Overhead |
|||
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
|||
Opening WIP |
200 |
200 |
|
|
60 |
120 |
60 |
120 |
Introduced |
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced & Finished |
|
900 |
100 |
900 |
100 |
900 |
100 |
900 |
Closing WIP |
|
150 |
100 |
150 |
70 |
105 |
70 |
105 |
TOTAL |
1,250 |
1,250 |
|
1,050 |
|
1,125 |
|
1,125 |
Statement showing element-wise cost per unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (Rs) |
Equiv. Prodn.
(Units) |
Cost per unit
(Rs) |
Materials |
1,050 |
1,050 |
1.00 |
Labour |
2,250 |
1,125 |
2.00 |
Production overheads |
1,125 |
1,125 |
1.00 |
TOTAL |
4,425 |
|
4.00 |
Statement showing value of
finished goods, work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units (Units) |
Cost per Unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Opening WIP (200 units @ Rs 4 p.u) (Transferred from previous period) |
|
|
|
|
800 |
Opening WIP (Finished during the current period) |
Labour Overheads |
120 120 |
2.00 1.00 |
240 120 |
360 |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material Labour Overheads |
900 900 900 |
1.00 2.00 1.00 |
900 1,800 900 |
3,600 |
Finished goods
transferred to the next process |
|
|
|
|
4,760 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour Overheads |
150 105 105 |
1.00 2.00 1.00 |
150 210 105 |
465 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
5,225 |
Process Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Opening WIP |
200 |
800 |
By Transfer to next process |
1,100 |
4,760 |
To Materials |
1,050 |
1,050 |
By Closing WIP |
150 |
465 |
To Labour |
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
To Overheads |
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
5,225 |
|
1,250 |
5,225 |
Illustration: 4
From the
following information prepare process account.
Opening WIP |
800 units @ Rs 6 per unit Rs 4,800 |
Stages of completion: |
Material A – 100%; Material B –
60%; Labour and Overheads – 40%. |
Units transferred from Process – I |
12,000 units costing Rs 16,350 |
Units transferred to next process |
9,700 units |
Normal process loss |
10% of processed units |
Closing WIP |
1,800 units |
Stages of completion: |
Material – 60%; Labour and
Overheads – 50% |
Other information:
1. Degree of completion for units
scrapped: Material 100%, Labour and Overhead 50%.
2. Scrap (Normal loss units) realised @
Rs 1.00 per unit.
3. Costs incurred during the current
period:
Material
Rs 10,500, Labour Rs 20,760, Overhead Rs 16,670.
Solution: 4
Statement Showing Equivalent
Production (Units) under FIFO method
Details |
Input units |
Output units |
Material A |
Material B |
Labour & OH |
|||
%-age |
Equiv units |
%-age |
Equiv units |
%-age |
Equiv units |
|||
Opening WIP |
800 |
800 |
|
|
40 |
320 |
60 |
480 |
Introduced |
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced and Finished |
|
8,900 |
100 |
8,900 |
100 |
8.900 |
100 |
8,900 |
Normal Loss |
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abnormal Loss (b/f) |
|
200 |
100 |
200 |
100 |
200 |
50 |
100 |
Closing WIP |
|
1,800 |
100 |
1,800 |
60 |
1,080 |
50 |
900 |
TOTAL |
12,800 |
12,800 |
|
10,900 |
|
10,500 |
|
10,380 |
Normal loss = 10% of (Opening
WIP + Introduced – Closing WIP)
= 10% of (800 + 12,000 – 1,800)
= 1,100 units
Statement Showing
Element-wise Cost Per Unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (Rs) |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Material A (Transferred from the previous
process) |
16,350 |
|
|
Less: Realisation from normal loss (1,100 × Rs
1) |
(1,100) |
|
|
|
15,250 |
10,900 |
1.39908 |
Material B (Added in the current process) |
10,500 |
10,500 |
1.00000 |
Labour (Added in the current process) |
20,760 |
10,380 |
2.00000 |
Overhead (Added in the current process) |
16,670 |
10,380 |
1.60597 |
TOTAL |
63,180 |
|
6.00505 |
Statement Showing Value of
Finished Goods, Work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Opening WIP (800 Units × Rs 6 p.u.) (Transferred from previous period) |
− |
− |
− |
− |
4,800 |
Opening WIP (Finished during the current period) |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
− 320 480 480 |
− 1.00 2.00 1.60597 |
− 320 960 771 |
2,051 |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 |
1.39908 1.00 2.00 1.60597 |
12,452 8,900 17,800 14,293 |
53,445 |
Finished goods transferred to the next process or finished goods store |
|
|
|
|
60,296 |
Abnormal loss |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
200 200 100 100 |
1.39908 1.00 2.00 1.60597 |
280 200 200 161 |
841 |
Closing WIP |
Material A Material B Labour Overhead |
1,800 1,080 900 900 |
1.39908 1.00 2.00 1.60597 |
2,518 1,080 1,800 1,445 |
6,843 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
67,980 |
Process Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Opening WIP |
800 |
4,800 |
By Normal loss |
1,100 |
1,100 |
To Transfer from previous Process |
12,000 |
16,350 |
|
|
|
To Materials (Indirect) |
|
10,500 |
By Abnormal loss |
200 |
841 |
To Labour |
|
20,760 |
By Transfer to next process |
9,700 |
60,296 |
To Overheads |
|
16,670 |
By Closing WIP |
1,800 |
6,843 |
|
12,800 |
69,080 |
|
12,800 |
69,080 |
Illustration: 5
Shrikrishna
Limited furnished you the following information relating to process B for the
month of October, 2019.
1.
Opening work-in-progress – NIL
2.
Units introduced – 10,000 units
@ Rs 3 per unit
3.
Expenses debited to the process;
Direct materials Rs 14,650; Labour Rs 21,148; Overheads Rs 42,000
4.
Finished output – 9,500 units
5.
Closing work-in-progress – 350 units;
6.
Degree of completion : Material 100%; Labour and
overheads 50%
7.
Normal loss in process – one percent of input
8.
Degree of completion of abnormal loss: Material 100% ;
Labour and Overheads 80%
9.
Units scrapped as normal loss were sold at Rs 1 per
unit
10.
All the units of abnormal loss were sold at Rs 2.50
per unit.
Prepare:
(a)
Statement of Equivalent Production
(b)
Statement of Cost
(c)
Process - B Account
(d)
Abnormal Loss Account
Solution: 5
Statement showing equivalent production (Units) under
FIFO method
Details |
Input (Units) |
Output (Units) |
Materials |
Labour |
Overhead |
|||
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
|||
Opening WIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced & Finished |
|
9,500 |
100 |
9,500 |
100 |
9,500 |
100 |
9,500 |
Normal loss (1% of 10,000) |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abnormal loss (b/f) |
|
50 |
100 |
50 |
80 |
40 |
80 |
40 |
Closing WIP |
|
350 |
100 |
350 |
50 |
175 |
50 |
175 |
TOTAL |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
9,900 |
|
9,715 |
|
9,715 |
Statement showing element-wise cost per unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (Rs) |
Equiv. Prodn.
(Units) |
Cost per unit
(Rs) |
Materials (30,000 + 14,650 – 100) |
44,550 |
9,900 |
4.5000 |
Labour |
21,148 |
9,715 |
2.1768 |
Production overheads |
42,000 |
9,715 |
4.3232 |
TOTAL |
77,798 |
|
11.0000 |
Statement showing value of
finished goods, work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units (Units) |
Cost per Unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material Labour Overheads |
9,500 9,500 9,500 |
4.5000 2.1768 4.3232 |
42,750 20,680 41,070 |
1,04,500 |
Finished goods transferred to the next process |
|
|
|
|
1,04,500 |
Abnormal loss |
Material Labour Overheads |
50 40 40 |
4.5000 2.1768 4.3232 |
225 87 173 |
485 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour Overheads |
350 175 175 |
4.5000 2.1768 4.3232 |
1,575 381 757 |
2,713 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
1,07,698 |
Process 'B' Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Units introduced |
10,000 |
30,000 |
By Normal loss |
100 |
100 |
To Materials |
|
14,650 |
By Abnormal loss |
50 |
485 |
To Labour |
|
21,148 |
By Transfer to next process |
9,500 |
1,04,500 |
To Overheads |
|
42,000 |
By Closing WIP |
350 |
2,713 |
|
1,250 |
1,07,798 |
|
1,250 |
1,07,798 |
Abnormal Loss Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Process A/c |
50 |
485 |
By Bank/Debtors A/c |
50 |
125 |
|
|
|
By Costing P and L A/c |
|
360 |
|
50 |
485 |
|
50 |
485 |
Illustration: 6
AB Ltd. is
engaged in process engineering industry. During the month of April, 2019, 2,000
units were introduced in Process ‘X’. The normal loss was estimated at 5% of
input. At the end of the month 1,400 units had been produced and transferred to
process Y. 460 units incomplete and 40 units after passing through fully the
entire process had to be scrapped. The incomplete units had reached the
following stage of completion:
Material |
75% completed |
Labour |
50% completed |
Overhead |
50% completed |
Following are the further information on the Process
‘X’:
|
Rs |
Cost of the
2,000 units |
58,000 |
Additional
Direct Material |
14,400 |
Direct Labour |
33,400 |
Direct Overheads
|
16,700 |
Units scrapped (including normal
loss) realised Rs 10 each. Prepare Statement of Equivalent Production,
Statement of Cost, Statement of Evaluation and the Process X Account.
Solution: 6
Statement showing equivalent production (Units) under
FIFO method
Details |
Input (Units) |
Output (Units) |
Materials |
Labour |
Overhead |
|||
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
|||
Opening WIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced & Finished |
|
1,400 |
100 |
1,400 |
100 |
1,400 |
100 |
1,400 |
Normal loss (5% of 2,000) |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abnormal loss (b/f) |
|
40 |
100 |
40 |
100 |
40 |
100 |
40 |
Closing WIP |
|
460 |
75 |
345 |
50 |
230 |
50 |
230 |
TOTAL |
2,000 |
2,000 |
|
1,785 |
|
1,670 |
|
1,670 |
Statement showing element-wise cost per unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (Rs) |
Equiv. Prodn.
(Units) |
Cost per unit
(Rs) |
Materials (58,000 + 14,400 – 1,000) |
71,400 |
1,785 |
40 |
Labour |
33,400 |
1,670 |
20 |
Production overheads |
16,700 |
1,670 |
10 |
TOTAL |
1,21,500 |
|
70 |
Statement showing value of
finished goods, work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units (Units) |
Cost per Unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material Labour Overheads |
1,400 1,400 1,400 |
40 20 10 |
56,000 28,000 14,000 |
98,000 |
Finished goods transferred to Process ‘Y’ |
|
|
|
|
98,000 |
Abnormal loss |
Material Labour Overheads |
40 40 40 |
40 20 10 |
1,600 800 400 |
2,800 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour Overheads |
345 230 230 |
40 20 10 |
13,800 4,600 2,300 |
20,700 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
1,21,500 |
Process ‘X’ Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Units introduced |
2,000 |
58,000 |
By Normal loss |
100 |
1000 |
To Materials |
|
14,400 |
By Abnormal loss |
40 |
2,800 |
To Labour |
|
33,400 |
By Transfer to Process ‘Y’ |
1,400 |
98,000 |
To Overheads |
|
16,700 |
By Closing WIP |
460 |
20,700 |
|
2,000 |
1,22,500 |
|
2,000 |
1,22,500 |
Illustration: 7
The following information is obtained in respect of process 3 of the month of August:
Opening Stock |
1,000 units |
Value |
Direct
Material (I) Rs 390; Direct material (II) Rs 75; Direct Labour Rs 112; Production
overhead Rs 118. |
Process 2
transfer |
6,000 units at
Rs 2,360 |
Process 4
transfer |
4,700 units. |
Direct
material added in process |
Rs 520 |
Direct labour
employed |
Rs 1,036 |
Production
Overheads |
Rs 1,541 |
Units scrapped
(including normal loss) |
300 |
Degree of
completion |
Direct
material 100%, Direct labour 80%, Production overhead 60% |
Closing stock |
2,000 units |
Degree of
completion: |
Direct
material 60%, Direct labour 50%, Production overhead 40% |
Normal loss: 5% of production (including units
scrapped). Scrap realised Rs 0.20 per unit.
Prepare Process Account on weighted
Average method.
Solution: 7
Statement Showing
Equivalent Production (Units) under Average method
Details |
Input Units |
Output Units |
Material |
Labour |
Overheads |
|||
% |
Equiv. Units |
% |
Equiv. Units |
% |
Equiv. Units |
|||
Opening WIP |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished & Transferred |
|
4,700 |
100 |
4,700 |
100 |
4,700 |
100 |
4,700 |
Normal Loss [(4,700 + 300) × 5%] |
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abnormal Loss (300 – 250) |
|
50 |
100 |
50 |
80 |
40 |
60 |
30 |
Closing WIP |
|
2,000 |
60 |
1,200 |
50 |
1,000 |
40 |
800 |
TOTAL |
7,000 |
7,000 |
|
5,950 |
|
5,740 |
|
5,530 |
Statement Showing
Element-wise Cost Per Unit
Cost Elements |
Opening WIP Rs |
Period cost Rs |
Total cost Rs |
Equivalent units |
Cost p.u. Rs |
Material I (Previous process) Material II (Current process) |
390 75 |
2,360 520 |
2,750 595 |
|
|
Less: Realisation from
normal loss |
|
(50) |
(50) |
|
|
|
465 |
2,830 |
3,295 |
5,950 |
0.55378 |
Labour |
112 |
1,036 |
1,148 |
5,740 |
0.20000 |
Overhead |
118 |
1,541 |
1,659 |
5,530 |
0.30000 |
TOTAL |
695 |
5,407 |
6,102 |
|
1.05378 |
Statement Showing Value of
Finished Goods, Work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units |
Cost per unit (Rs) |
Cost (Rs) |
Total (Rs) |
Finished goods transferred to Process: 4 |
Material Labour Overhead |
4,700 4,700 4,700 |
0.55378 0.20000 0.30000 |
2,603 940 1,410 |
4,953 |
Abnormal loss |
Material Labour Overhead |
50 40 30 |
0.55378 0.20000 0.30000 |
28 8 9 |
45 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour Overhead |
1,200 1,000 800 |
0.55378 0.20000 0.30000 |
664 200 240 |
1,104 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
6,102 |
Process: ‘3’ Account
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
Particulars |
Units |
Rs |
To Opening WIP |
1,000 |
695 |
By Normal loss (250 × 0.2) |
250 |
50 |
To Units introduced |
6,000 |
2,360 |
By Abnormal loss |
50 |
45 |
To Materials |
|
520 |
By Transfer to Process: 4 |
4,700 |
4,953 |
To Labour |
|
1,036 |
By Closing WIP |
2,000 |
1,104 |
To Overheads |
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
6,152 |
|
7,000 |
6,152 |
Illustration: 8
A chemical is manufactured in two processes, X and Y. Data for process Y
for last month is as follows:
1. Material transferred from process X - 2,000 litres @ Rs 4 per litre;
2. Conversion costs incurred Rs 12,250;
3. Output transferred to finished goods 1,600 litres;
4. Closing work in progress 100 litres;
5. Normal loss is 10% of input;
6. All losses are fully processed and have a scrap value of Rs 4 per litre;
7. Closing work in progress is fully complete for material, but is only 50
per cent processed.
Calculate the value of the completed output
and the value of the closing work in progress.
Solution: 8
Statement showing equivalent production (Litres) under
FIFO method
Details |
Input (Litres) |
Output (Litres) |
Materials |
Labour & Overheads |
||
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
|||
Opening WIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced &
Finished |
|
1,600 |
100 |
1,600 |
100 |
1,600 |
Normal loss (10% of 2,000) |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
Abnormal loss
(b/f) |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Closing WIP |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
50 |
50 |
TOTAL |
2,000 |
2,000 |
|
1,800 |
|
1,750 |
Statement showing element-wise cost per unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (`) |
Equiv. Prodn. (Units) |
Cost per unit (`) |
Materials
transferred from Process ‘X’ (Rs 4 × 2,000) |
8,000 |
|
|
Less: Realisation
from Normal Loss (Rs 4 × 200) |
800 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
1,800 |
4 |
Labour and
Overheads |
12,250 |
1,750 |
7 |
TOTAL |
19,050 |
|
11 |
Statement showing value of
finished goods, work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units (Units) |
Cost per unit (`) |
Cost (`) |
Total (`) |
Introduced and finished during the current period |
Material Labour & OH |
1,600 1,600 |
4 7 |
6,400 11,200 |
17,600 |
Finished goods transferred to the next process |
|
|
|
|
17,600 |
Abnormal loss |
Material Labour & OH |
100 100 |
4 7 |
400 700 |
1,100 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour & OH |
100 50 |
4 7 |
400 350 |
750 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
19,450 |
Process ‘Y’ Account
Particulars |
Units |
` |
Particulars |
Units |
` |
To Units introduced |
2,000 |
8,000 |
By Normal loss
(Rs 4 × 200) |
200 |
800 |
To Labour &
OH |
|
12,250 |
By Abnormal loss |
100 |
1,100 |
|
|
|
By Transfer to
next process |
1,600 |
17,600 |
|
|
|
By Closing WIP |
100 |
750 |
|
2,000 |
20,250 |
|
2,000 |
20,250 |
Illustration: 9
Opening work-in-process 1,000 units (60% complete), Cost Rs 1, 10,000.
Units introduced during the period 10,000 units, Total Cost Rs 19, 30,000
(Materials + Conversion Cost). Transferred to next process 9,000 units;
Closing work-in-process 800 units (75% complete); Normal loss is
estimated at 10% of total input including units in process at the beginning.
Scraps realise Rs 10 per unit. Scraps are 100% complete.
Using FIFO method, compute equivalent production and cost per
equivalent unit. Also evaluate the output.
Solution: 9
Statement showing equivalent production (Units) under
FIFO method
Details |
Input (Units) |
Output (Units) |
Materials |
Labour & Overheads |
||
% |
Equiv. |
% |
Equiv. |
|||
Opening WIP |
1,000 |
1,000 |
40 |
400 |
40 |
400 |
Introduced |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced &
Finished |
|
8,000 |
100 |
8,000 |
100 |
8,000 |
Normal loss (10% of 11,000) |
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
Abnormal loss
(b/f) |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Closing WIP |
|
800 |
75 |
600 |
75 |
600 |
TOTAL |
11,000 |
11,000 |
|
9,100 |
|
9,100 |
Statement showing element-wise cost per unit
Cost elements |
Period cost (`) |
Equiv. Prodn. (Units) |
Cost per unit (`) |
Units introduced
(including all the cost elements –
materials, labour and overheads) |
19,30,000 |
|
|
Less: Realisation
from Normal Loss (Rs 10 × 1,100) |
11,000 |
|
|
|
19,19,000 |
9,100 |
210.87912 |
Statement showing value of
finished goods, work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units (Units) |
Cost per unit (`) |
Cost (`) |
Total (`) |
Opening WIP (Transferred from previous period) |
|
|
|
|
1,10,000 |
Opening WIP (Finished during the current period) |
Total cost |
400 |
210.87912 |
|
84,352 |
Introduced and finished |
Total cost |
8,000 |
210.87912 |
|
16,87,033 |
Finished goods
transferred to the next process |
|
|
|
|
18,81,385 |
Abnormal loss |
Total cost |
100 |
210.87912 |
|
21,088 |
Closing WIP |
Total cost |
600 |
210.87912 |
|
1,26,527 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
20,29,000 |
Process Account
Particulars |
Units |
` |
Particulars |
Units |
` |
To Opening WIP |
1,000 |
1,10,000 |
By Normal loss
(Rs 4 × 200) |
1,100 |
11,000 |
To Units
introduced |
10,000 |
19,30,000 |
By Abnormal loss |
100 |
21,088 |
|
|
|
By Transfer to
next process |
9,000 |
18,81,385 |
|
|
|
By Closing WIP |
800 |
1,26,527 |
|
11,000 |
20,40,000 |
|
11,000 |
20,40,000 |
Illustration: 10
Q Co. makes one product using process costing. Weighted average method
is used for valuation of work-in-progress. For the month of September the following
information is available:
1. Opening work-in-progress - 1,000 units;
2. Value of opening WIP:
i. Material Rs 122,500,
ii. Conversion costs Rs 67,000.
During the month 2,250 units were added and the following costs were
incurred:
i. Material Rs 4,95,000,
ii. Conversion costs Rs 5,46,750.
Closing work-in-progress was 1,250 units (Material 100% complete and
Conversion costs 90% complete).
Compute the value of completed output for the period.
Solution: 10
Statement Showing Equivalent Production Units
Details |
Input Units |
Output Units |
Material |
Labour & OH |
||
%-age Completion |
Equivalent Units |
%-age
Completion |
Equivalent Units |
|||
Opening WIP |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
2,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Finished & Transferred |
|
2,000 |
100 |
2,000 |
100 |
2,000 |
Closing WIP |
|
1,250 |
100 |
1,250 |
90 |
1,125 |
TOTAL |
3,250 |
3,250 |
|
3,250 |
|
3,125 |
Statement Showing Element-wise Cost Per Unit
Cost Elements |
Opening WIP ` |
Period cost ` |
Total cost ` |
Equivalent units |
Cost p.u. ` |
Material |
1,22,500 |
4,95,000 |
6,17,500 |
3,250 |
190.00 |
Labour and Overhead |
67,000 |
5,46,750 |
6,13,750 |
3,125 |
196.40 |
TOTAL |
1,89,500 |
10,41,750 |
12,31,250 |
|
386.40 |
Statement Showing Value of Finished Goods,
Work-in-progress, etc.
Items to be valued |
Cost elements |
Equivalent units |
Cost p.u. (`) |
Cost (`) |
Total (`) |
Finished goods transferred to the next process or F. G. store |
Material Labour + OH |
2,000 2,000 |
190.00 196.40 |
3,80,000 3,92,600 |
7,72,800 |
Closing WIP |
Material Labour + OH |
1,250 1,125 |
190.00 196.40 |
2,37,500 2,20,950 |
4,58,450 |
TOTAL COST |
|
|
|
|
12,31,250 |
I read this airticle and understood this airticle. This airticle is very easy to understand for student. My suggestion to follow this airtle.
ReplyDeleteThank you Subhadip for your comments. I assure you of publishing more such students-friendly quality articles on different topics of various subjects of CMA and other professional courses.
ReplyDeleteVery nice and helpful:)
ReplyDeleteNice and helpful
ReplyDeleteA difficult chapter particularly the computation of equivalent production part. But everything discussed so nicely I understood the whole chapter very well and enjoyed solving the sums.
ReplyDelete